March 1, 2023


My Email Subject

It’s Russell Fortmeyer, Global Sustainability Leader at Woods Bagot, with another Not So Much. I have been thinking a lot about climate risk these days, since we are in the middle of an intense and bizarre winter storm in California. I will say what every Californian says: we need the rain. But in architecture, we are witnessing urban systems and developments that are put increasingly at risk by even minor storm events.

P.S. I recently sat down with the host of the Smarter Cities podcast, Jason de Sousa, to discuss the business case for Net Zero 2050. Stream our conversation here.


For the last five years, I have taught a graduate class at the Southern California Institute of Architecture that I have informally called “Hot Stuff.” Hey, I grew up listening to Donna Summer at a very early age, probably too early, so I cannot resist forcing my students to think about climate change through the lens of disco. We might as well have fun as we try to keep the global average temperature rise below three degrees celsius, right? 

I talk a lot about urban heat in this newsletter because it is at the top of the charts for risks associated with the climate crisis and, yet, we are still designing most buildings around the world based on typical meteorological year (TMY) weather data. That is, we take data from a historical set of observations from a 30-year period and assume the most typical conditions from that period will exist over the life of the building we are designing. The extreme heat waves and expanded summer seasons we now see are just the start of a century of increasing temperatures, none of which are reflected in a TMY weather file you might download.  

a.    The Universal Thermal Climate Index, or UTCI, is an equivalent air temperature that represents a combination of air temperature, wind, radiation, and humidity at the time. Shown at left, the annual historical weather data that is used to inform typical weather files, in this case Melbourne, is represented with UTCI taking those factors into account. By morphing weather data based on UNIPCC climate change scenarios, the annual UTCI chart for Melbourne on the right demonstrates some clear differences from the historical model. Extreme temperatures, whether cold or hot, become more common in the predicted weather model. This window into the future climate of the city leads designers to ask different questions about how outdoor or semi-outdoor spaces may feel in these likely conditions. 

Our energy models, thermal comfort models, urban microclimate studies—whatever it is you may be modeling and analyzing in the digital space—reflects a climate that no longer exists. An engineer will tell you not to worry since we probably have 20 percent or more safety factors built into various system capacities. You can disagree with me on that one if you want (or if you are an engineer), but show me the numbers (or ask a lawyer). Also, we cannot just keep throwing air conditioning at this problem…we need a design agenda that provides credible alternatives. or at least plans for redundancy for systems, in a way that anticipates actual future conditions. 

For the last two months, we have been assessing the climate risk of our seventeen studio locations as part of our annual sustainability report, the Woods Bagot Climate Playbook. We started by reviewing city and regional climate action and adaptation plans for each location to understand the risks and opportunities for our clients and our own operations. The first thing I will say is that it is impressive to look at the incredible body of knowledge captured in these plans. From New York City’s OneNYC 2050 to Melbourne’s Climate Change Mitigation Strategy to 2050 or, my favorite, Los Angeles’s Green New Deal, these plans have done the work to lay out the challenges and opportunities with clear implications for designers of the built environment. They are required reading for any climate activist in architecture.

b.    The modeled view on the left illustrates the Universal Thermal Climate Index, or UTCI, for a proposed highrise in Melbourne, Australia. Designers incorporated outdoor terraces into the project, which necessitated an investigation into the environmental conditions that would support occupancy of those spaces throughout the year. This image shows UTCI data for June 15, which would be early winter months and shows a daytime UTCI of between 17-18˚C, which would be considered comfortable. In comparison to the historical UTCI model, the outdoor spaces in the same proposed highrise in Melbourne reveal a much colder condition when modeled using WeatherShift data as shown on the right. A UTCI of nearly 13˚C would suggest these terraces may not be comfortable during winter months or may necessitate a design change to provide some wind protection to improve the outcome. Although we often focus on extreme heat in the future given the climate crisis, understanding the potential for seasonal extremes can inform many different design outcomes. 

Not surprisingly, in every city we work, extreme heat is a key climate risk. Other risks run the gamut from sea level rise, coastal flooding, extreme rain events or drought, to indirect risks associated with infrastructure capacity or vulnerable populations. You also stumble across surprise risks you may not consider, like in New York City where a projection in groundwater rise can pose serious risks to basements, especially those used as apartments.  

How do you take a city’s climate action plan and instrumentalize it as part of a design process? This is where we have to question those distorted weather files. To ensure Woods Bagot is designing with reliable data, our approach was to partner with the global engineering firm, Arup, and invest in a set of future weather files based on UNIPCC climate change scenarios for all our studios. Using Arup’s WeatherShift tool, we have embedded future weather data as an option in our own Environmental Performance Toolkit (EPT). The EPT is a set of modules we have developed for our Rhino workflow to help teams quickly assess environmental design opportunities early enough in the concept phase to inform major design decisions.  

WeatherShift is a powerful data set that morphs TMY files and generates 8,760 hours of likely future dry bulb temperatures, wet bulb temperatures, and relative humidity numbers, among other outputs, to establish a reasonable approximation of how a climate will change given increased emissions scenarios and global warming. 

This technology provides our design teams with a way to frame early support for passive design opportunities like natural ventilation, solar control, thermal comfort, or daylighting in a way that can anticipate likely scenarios of increasing temperatures. Comparing it to the historical TMY output may alter our appreciation for how the solar reflectance index of a pavement finish impacts heat islands, or whether the number of hours you can comfortably naturally ventilate an office building makes sense for an occupant.  

Of course, a weather file is a weather file, so you can plug a future file into any software you use and compare it to the TMY file output (you can also play around with WeatherShift for free on the website). This approach is not going to answer every question we as designers have, nor will it unlock some secret knowledge about our practice and climate change, but it provides credible evidence as a basis for conversations with our colleagues and clients about risks.  

These sorts of tools are a way for architects to chip away at the uncertainty we face with a planet that is changing faster than we can imagine. We need many more hot takes on hot stuff given the challenges we collectively face.


Funding San Francisco’s Climate Action: Strategies for Revenue, Implementation, and Equity, Berkley Law’s Center for Law, Energy, & the Environment–This report was published in November; it’s one of the best reports I have seen for taking a climate action plan, putting a budget to it, and identifying pathways to implementation. We need these plans everywhere, so it has a lot of ideas that could travel well. 

Atmosphere Anatomies: On Design, Weather, and Sensation, by Silvia Benedito, Lars Müller Publishers (2021)–This is a book I use for readings in my class, specifically the chapter that explores the passive microclimate design work of the Brazilian master architect Lina Bo Bardi at the Pompéia Community Center in São Paulo. Try adopting just one of the multiple strategies she deployed to address urban heat on this incredible project.  

2022 Status Report, The Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures–Wondering if your clients or market sectors are taking climate change seriously? A dense, but critical cheat sheet.  



Copyright © 2022 Woods Bagot, All rights reserved.

Our Studio Locations:

Adelaide Studio: Level 14, 11 Waymouth Street, Adelaide

Auckland Studio: Level 3, 106-108 Quay Street, Auckland
Brisbane Studio: Level 14, 80 Ann Street Brisbane
Melbourne Studio: Mezzanine 498 Little Collins Street Melbourne
Perth Studio: The Palace 108 St. Georges Terrace
Sydney Studio: Level 2, 60 Carrington Street, Sydney NSW
Hong Kong Studio: Level 22, The Centrium, 60 Wyndham Street, Central Hong Kong
Shanghai Studio: Plaza 336, 9F, 336 Middle Xizang Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai China 20000
Beijing Studio: 10F, Building H, Phoenix Place, No A5 Shuguangxili, Chaoyang Beijing, China 100028
Shenzhen Studio: Units 07&08, 44/F, 3031 Shennan Middle Road, Hon Kwok Center, 
Futian District, Shenzhen China 518017
Singapore: 38 Bukit Pasoh Road, Singapore 089852
London Studio: 75 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, United Kingdom
Abu Dhabi: Cloud Spaces, Level 1 Town Square, Yas Mall, Yas Island, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Dubai Studio: Office 1, Level 1, The Offices 1, One Central, Dubai World Trade Centre, Dubai, UAE
New York Studio: 30 Broad Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10004
Los Angeles Studio: The Bradbury Building, 304 South Broadway, Floor 2, Los Angeles, CA 90013 USA
San Francisco Studio: 128 Spear Street, Ground Floor San Francisco CA 94105 USA

Woods Bagot Notice and Disclaimer – The information contained in this email (including attachments) is confidential. In the event that this email transmission is received in error, please inform the sender by return email then delete this email and your reply from your records. Woods Bagot does not warrant that information or data in this email transmission is error or virus free. The receivers of this email transmission shall ascertain the accuracy and completeness of the information or data received. Although computer virus scanning software is used by Woods Bagot, the receivers of this email shall be responsible for the extent and sufficiency of their own virus protection and Woods Bagot shall not be held liable for any loss, damage, claim, cost or expense arising from the use of or in connection with the information or data contained in this transmission.